Skip to main content

Salty Neo finally followed the path I drew.

August 1, 2025

Thanks to a certain user for personally proving the accuracy of my judgment in Rights Protection Record and PDF archive through forwarding and humiliating epithets. You think I’m writing a prophecy, but actually, I just typed out her script in advance. She doesn’t even dare to put her name on it, yet can’t help but try to ride the wave of traffic—this is truly her real self.

Figure 1 · www.tumblr.com/ladyyomiart/790618164973142016/especially-because-i-mostly-write-canonoc-its?source=share
  1. She is not “neutral,” but emotionally takes a strong side with ladyyomi

The document states that she was “packaged as an emotional anchor” and “enjoyed immunity from review,” and I questioned whether this was covering up collusion.

And now she personally reposts ladyyomi’s posts, praises my statistics, and uses “the one starting with y” to humiliate me—completely confirming that she is not neutral at all, but is even consciously participating in humiliating me.

  1. She tacitly approves of and benefits from the persona attacking me, while unwilling to take responsibility.

I wrote that she “never condemned her supporters’ harassment, only demanded that I apologize,” and this has played out again in her support of ladyyomi.

She consumes my data and enjoys the popularity I bring, yet refuses to acknowledge my identity—this is precisely the typical pattern of “parasitic benefit + anonymous retreat.”

  1. She is not passively involved but has clear motives and execution strategies

I pointed out in the document that in the controversy, “once Qiu is no longer a convenient scapegoat, a new target for projection is needed,” and her behavior of “suddenly blocking me + tacitly liking posts afterward” shows that she chose to cooperate in attacking me, distancing herself from responsibility, while also gaining traffic support.

  1. She is carrying out “soft violence,” suppressing dissenters through morally euphemistic means.

In the document, I pointed out that she “does not engage in direct dialogue, but instead constructs structural oppression through blocking, emotional blackmail, and verbal avoidance.”

Nowadays, she does not speak to me directly but indirectly refers to me with insulting terms on public platforms, which precisely confirms what I said.