I am writing to clarify my position regarding recent accusations and to highlight why my actions have been fully within the boundaries of legitimate self-defense.
My actions have been defensive, not offensive.
I have only responded to repeated, targeted harassment directed at me over a prolonged period. My posts consist of documented evidence, careful rebuttals, and public records of interactions. At no point did I engage in personal insults or the release of private information.
The recent posts by user “vicecommanderhijikata” demonstrate the ongoing harassment.
In one post, he referred to me with explicitly abusive language, calling me “an arrogant little bitch.”
In another, he blamed Tumblr’s moderation system and openly misrepresented the situation, while continuing to direct hostility at me.
These public records confirm that my original concerns about targeted harassment are valid and ongoing.
My responses are factual and transparent.
I have never asked for any special treatment. I simply want equal protection under the Community Guidelines. If I am to be judged, it should be on the actual content of my posts—which have been consistently within policy—not on the false narrative created by those seeking to silence me.
I urge Tumblr to distinguish between harassment and defense.
It is dangerous to allow repeated abusers to frame their victims as aggressors when those victims respond with documentation.
If defensive documentation is punished, the effect is to shield those who perpetuate harassment, while further isolating the people they target.
In conclusion, I want to reaffirm: my actions are not harassment, but self-protection. I remain committed to maintaining transparency and complying with Tumblr’s policies. I ask that the platform recognize the difference between malicious attacks and a user’s right to defend themselves with evidence.
It has come to my attention that there are circulating claims suggesting that the account “ladyyomiart” was not banned by Tumblr, but rather voluntarily deactivated by its owner to portray herself as a victim. This narrative is a deliberate attempt to obscure her prior record of targeted harassment and to shift attention away from her misconduct.
Let me be clear:
The manner in which an account disappears does not erase the underlying violations. Whether through a ban or voluntary deactivation, it does not change the fact that she engaged in repeated harassment toward myself and others.
Voluntary deactivation can itself be a tactic of evasion. Instead of addressing her actions or taking responsibility, she chose to disappear in a way designed to mislead others and recast herself as a victim.
All of my own responses have remained within the bounds of platform rules. My statements have focused on facts and documented evidence, never personal attacks. I trust Tumblr will recognize the difference between evidence-based defense and manipulative misrepresentation.
For this reason, I respectfully urge Tumblr’s Trust & Safety team to keep the focus where it belongs:
Do not allow the optics of “voluntary deactivation” to obscure a history of misconduct.
Do not enable wrongdoers to escape accountability through self-victimization.
Prioritize fairness and safety by protecting those who abide by the rules, rather than those who exploit loopholes and manipulate narratives.
