This is a supplemental documentation post regarding the user lightmelodyva, whos
August 23, 2025
This is a supplemental documentation post regarding the user lightmelodyva, whose repeated public statements contain identity defamation, coordinated harassment, mental health shaming, and social invalidation tactics. Please consider this a formal addition to the open harassment reports.
In multiple public posts and comments, lightmelodyva repeatedly claims that I am Autumn and merges me with several IDs (ygpgsgl/Anonymous) as one person, the language used includes:
- “Saya/Autumn/ygpgsgl/Anonymous/whatever-you-call-yourself, you are all one and the same.”
- “If you’re not Autumn, you’re still doing the same shit.”
- “Show the Discord IDs. You won’t, because you can’t.”
She has no evidence but repeatedly publicly claims that I am a “multiple ID manipulator,” and uses the premise “you refuse to prove yourself → you are lying” to invert the logic, trapping me in a situation where I cannot prove myself.
She used the following phrases in multiple speeches:
- “That’s sad and should get more medical attention.”
- “You’re just mentally hurting yourself to the point of a delusion.”
- “No sympathy. That died a long time ago.”
These statements constitute typical mental health shaming language, not only denying my account of the harassment but also describing my actions as “delusional symptoms” and “self-harming behavior,” which is not only a defamation of personal motives but also an insult to all who have experienced mental distress.
She claims:
- “I’m an Okuzume Captain and Mibu Wolf.”
- “Mibu Wolves move in packs.”
- “A big enough pack can still take down something bigger.”
This is not a metaphor. In her imagination, she is a character leading an organization to “hunt down something bigger.” You don’t need to understand these anime terms, just know that—she sees me as a “monster,” and regards the siege as a form of “righteous hunting.” This is precisely the collective attack imagination in verbal violence, which strips me from being a “person” to a “target that must be destroyed by the group.”
When I started writing to clarify the trouble she and ladyyomi caused me, she and ladyyomi interacted in the comment section as follows: “That awful fake interview where she mocks my autism, my bisexual OC…”
And her response was to pretend to be innocent again, turning it around to accuse me of “mocking the disabled,” yet she never provides specific paragraphs, never clarifies, never engages in dialogue, relying solely on labels and stigmatization to counter all my statements. She is not a “bystander suddenly caught up,” she is a structural accomplice of ladyyomi, in the rhetoric of imposing “public opinion executions” and “character judgments,” the two cooperate seamlessly and with precise timing.
Although lightmelodyva doesn’t say much in her reposts, she almost always forwards ladyyomi’s multiple defamatory threads against me every time they are updated, totaling more than ten times. These threads included fabrications about my identity, slanders on my mental state, distortions of OC settings, and widespread dissemination of the “fake interview” label, although she did not publicly comment, she provided social endorsement and helped spread these statements through repeated reposting.
In the structure of social platforms, this kind of “silent boosting” behavior is also part of the harassment network, because it:
- enhances the visibility and spread of the perpetrator’s posts;
- provides the author with psychological confirmation of “having allies”;
This left me, who was already marginalized, facing a verbal assault of “Everyone else is switching, so the problem must be with you.”
She is not an innocent bystander; she is someone who helps mend the noose. She is not “too lazy to argue”; she is “willing to let others do the cursing.” This seemingly gentle but actually ruthless silent accomplice is one of the seamstresses who stitch together the harassment network.
Post by @lightmelodyva · 7 images
The user lightmelodyva collaborates with ladyyomiart to misattribute a third account (“Dori”) to me, publicly labeling me as “another alt / queen of alts” without evidence.
lightmelody’s own “timeline” shows private coordination with ladyyomi (“went and messaged her”), an agreement to “stay out,” then continued public escalation. ladyyomi claims she deleted the DMs while keeping the accusation live, and both users amplify each other’s statements, converting speculation into defamatory “facts.”
This constitutes misattribution/defamation, evidence evasion/spoliation, and coordinated amplification within a harassment campaign.
Evidence Group A｜lightmelody’s “MY Timeline” Long Post
Key Points Summary:
Preconceived Hostility and Identity Bias
- “01-08-25: Blocked saya/widemushroom…”
👉 Clearly hostile to me (or the person she mistakenly referred to) even before the March incident, not an outsider but a biased participant.
Claims “first private communication with Yomi” and took the initiative to contact
- “I noticed Yomi’s comment, went and messaged her and asked what happened.”
👉 Personally established a private message channel with ladyyomi, not passively watching, but actively entering the conflict network.
Admitting “both parties agreed not to get involved,” yet continuously posting/forwarding attacking content afterwards
- “Both agreed to stay out of this situation.”
👉 This statement is self-contradictory with her subsequent continuous posts and forwards: knowing she should withdraw, she still continues to participate and spread.
Outsourcing the obligation to collect evidence to others + avoiding disclosure
- “Yomi can choose to show the messages if she wishes…”
👉 Refusing to present evidence on the grounds of “private messages privacy,” yet continuing to publicly label others, constitutes a combination of evidence avoidance + public opinion conviction.
Claims to have “only learned about YGP later,” but the timeline is inconsistent
- “This is when I learned the existence of YGP.”
👉 Compared to proactively contacting Yomi at the end of March and the subsequent high-frequency referral behavior, the claim of being “late to realize” does not match the objective level of participation and can be labeled as a self-exonerating narrative.
Selective narration, avoiding evidence disclosure, continuing to spread after the “agreed exit”; Replacing the factual chain with a self-narrated timeline to mislead platform review.
Evidence Group B｜ladyyomi’s reply in your Figure 2 + duet with lightmelody
Can be directly qualified:
Baseless identity framing (Defamation / Misattribution)
- ladyyomi: “I was fully convinced it was yet another alt of Saya/Widemushroom/Autumn so I blocked her…”
👉 Admitting it is only “convinced/subjective belief”, yet publicly accusing me of being a “sockpuppet” based on this, constitutes defamatory misidentification.
Further posting a Google Docs link, attributing the cause of the “guest hate comments” to me.
Evidence destruction/avoidance (Spoliation)
- “I don’t have the messages anymore since I deleted the chat back in March (I think?)”
👉 Publicly accusing on one hand, while claiming to have deleted key private messages on the other; this constitutes evidence tampering, which instead undermines the credibility of their claims.
Collaborative amplification and the “factualization” label
- lightmelody: “…either it’s one dedicated friend of theirs or the same person.” (still speculation)
- ladyyomi responds: “yet another alt from the queen of alts.”
👉 The duet from guessing to asserting labels is a form of coordinated amplification: packaging unverified assumptions as “accepted facts,” triggering bystanders to conform and dogpile.
Repeatedly misidentifying/framing (attributing “Dori” to me without evidence); Deleting potentially crucial chat records while continuing to publicly convict; Collaborative amplification (original post + chorus-like follow-up comments), forming a networked harassment amplifier.
In addition, I also pointed out on page 24 of the PDF that lightmelodyva is suspected of defaming and insulting me through AO3’s anonymous comment feature:
Evidence
The Fallacy of “You Reap What You Sow”
Reblog by @lightmelodyva · 1 image
Post by @lightmelodyva · 1 image
This post by lightmelodyva exemplifies targeted harassment through labeling tactics. By publicly tagging me as “AI Generated Response,” she attempts to brand my work as inauthentic, delegitimize my contributions, and incite community exclusion. This is not an isolated insult but part of a sustained pattern of defamatory posts (see prior PSA and related attacks). Such labeling strips me of credibility in the community and creates a hostile environment. This evidence demonstrates a clear violation of harassment and anti-bullying policy.
This false claim about Autumn was already refuted with evidence in March. Its reappearance by lightmelodyva strongly indicates she is not merely repeating hearsay but actively perpetuating and likely originating the defamatory narrative.
There is at least 90% overlap in wording between the anonymous guest comments and lightmelodyva’s long post, strongly suggesting the same source of harassment.